Nevertheless another problem with democracy.

An obvious solution exists for this:"Conservation is toetung us."Realizing which it straight was meant, Curtis smiled broadly and fast it adds that is it naturally thousand reasons conserve.But one to the thing gave, surely: Preservation sets cash gegurtete urban districts into little a essiggurke. More durable post Walkerton regulations, increasing communities and a rising reserve of the zerbroeckelnden pipes, which must be regulated, drives up costs, even during careful consumers their consumption lowers and the size of their bills.Toronto alone to verges over value $800 million of the repair and re-installation work is, since half of the water main lines of the city and 30 per cent its sewage drain are than 50 years old more. But last year, was gross income only the $604 million.The solution is prices to raise. I know that there are poor people, which wish you its to afford water. If that is really the case, give them larger welfare examinations. The price of the water is an expenditure, which independently of the expenditure of poverty.Unfortunately be treated should not, which is, like it in a modern democracy functioned. Price increases are the area of the government, and customers could do nowhere otherwise them water of buy, but they can fire those rather easily, which increase their water calculations. Since a friend explained to me, markets do not work, if consumers instead of suppliers receive, indirectly to determine, they paid which price. For a selected government official it is "does the wrong thing or suffers consequences."Of the course, can some government official the tendency straeuben themselves and the dirty work settle instead of to buy you away from the blocks of the voters. These are people, which are isolated from the public. The highest court with its lifetime appointments comes itself to care. The federal reserve in addition. We would be really away better, if institutes this way?We face a compromise worked on more government. More control, those we give to the voters, that more strongly the use of the democracy: (1) believes to bend the public good-represented and (2) the decisions, to be formed in agreement also, which wishes the public. When we give less control to the voters, although officials can meet the durable elections then, which must be formed -- even if they could be price increases.How you to repair this compromise? Is there a way to prevent it? Can we convince voters not to throw a politician somewhat out from office for doing which is necessary for the long-term health of the community?
Source: http://bobvis.blogspot.com/2008/02/yet-another-problem-with-democracy.html

Review this site too: mp3 (http://mp3getitnow.com)